When it comes to cannabis public policy, the United States is home to some of the most ridiculous policies on earth, at least from a contradictory standpoint. Cannabis first became prohibited at the federal level in the United States in 1937. For many decades every state prohibited all forms of cannabis.

In the early 1970s the first state in the country, Oregon, decriminalized cannabis in direct defiance of federal law. In 1996 California became the first state to legalize cannabis for medical use, and in 2012 both Colorado and Washington State became the first to legalize cannabis for adult use. Meanwhile, cannabis remained prohibited throughout all of it at the federal level and still remains prohibited despite so many states having passed medical and/or adult-use legalization measures in recent years.

Fortunately, efforts have picked up in Congress to finally legalize cannabis at the federal level, at least to some degree. For various reasons, not the least of which is the standard inefficiencies of Congress, legalization has remained elusive. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has indicated that he plans to introduce a bill in April that he seems to think he can build a coalition around. Below is more information about it via a news release from NORML:

Washington, DC: US Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer announced at a press conference on Friday that he intends to formally introduce the Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act (CAOA) in April. The forthcoming legislation, which was released in draft form last July, repeals federal marijuana prohibition by removing cannabis from the US Controlled Substances Act.

Speaking at the event, Sen. Schumer said: “In the coming weeks, we’re ramping up our outreach and we expect to introduce final legislation. Our goal is to do it in April. Then we begin the nationwide push, spearheaded by New York, to get the federal law done. As the majority leader, I can set priorities. This is a priority for me.”

NORML’s Political Director Morgan Fox responded: “We are enthusiastic that the Senator is moving forward on his promise to prioritize cannabis policy reform in the 117th Congress. It is our hope that the official introduction of CAOA jumpstarts hearings and debates in the Upper Chamber — debates that are long overdue.”

In past months, Senate leadership has received criticism for both the slow rollout of the CAOA and for failing to support efforts to enact more incremental federal legislation, such as The SAFE Banking Act, which has been passed multiple times by the US House of Representatives.

NORML was among numerous groups that submitted comments in response to the CAOA draft. Specifically, NORML called for:

• Strengthening civic protections, including record relief, to provide justice to those previously wronged by federal marijuana criminalization;
• Revising outdated employment policies regarding non-scientific testing for trace metabolic elements of THC;
• Ensuring that small and local businesses can compete both with larger corporations and the unregulated market by reducing regulatory and tax burdens;
• Narrowing the scope of the proposed excise tax to exempt medical cannabis consumer markets;
• Balancing the roles of the FDA, TTB (Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau), ATF, and antitrust regulators in a manner that is consistent with other adult-use substances, such as alcohol or tobacco, to ensure non-disruption of currently operational state programs and promoting increased local ownership in the future iterations of the marketplace.

The entirety of NORML’s comments are available.

As initially drafted, the Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act directs the US Attorney General to remove marijuana from the federal Controlled Substances Act — thereby allowing states to either maintain or establish their own cannabis regulatory policies free from undue federal interference. Under this scheme, state governments – if they choose to do so – can continue to impose criminal penalties for marijuana possession offenses. However, states would not be permitted to prohibit the interstate commerce of legal cannabis products transported through their borders.

The proposal also mandates for the expungement of the records of anyone convicted of a federal, non-violent marijuana offense. The expungements must take place within one year of the law’s enactment.

The Act also forbids federal officials from taking discriminatory actions against those who legally use cannabis. It prohibits “individuals from being denied any federal public benefit … on the basis of [the] use or possession of cannabis.” It also, for the first time, permits physicians associated with the US Department of Veterans Affairs to make recommendations to their patients to access medical cannabis.

The proposal transfers primary agency jurisdiction over cannabis regulation from the US Drug Enforcement Administration to the Food and Drug Administration and to the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau in a manner similar to the ways in which these agencies already oversee alcohol and tobacco products. A federal excise tax of 10 percent would be imposed within the first year of the law’s enactment. Medical cannabis access programs, which are operational in the majority of US states, would not be disrupted under this federal plan.

The proposed Senate plan is competing against two other House bills, The MORE Act and The States Reform Act, both of which also seek to deschedule cannabis at the federal level. The MORE Act previously was advanced by the US House of Representative in the 116th Congress and is expected to be taken up again by House lawmakers in the coming weeks.

Additional information on the Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act is available from NORML.