Skip to main content

Tag: finland

Study Finds That Cannabis Legalization Could “Stabilize Finland’s GDP”

As the emerging legal cannabis industry continues to spread throughout Europe, one nation that is a bit of a holdout is Finland. Cannabis is not a new thing in Finland, as demonstrated by pollen samples found in Sakinlampi in 1994 that were dated to as far back as 4,000 B.C.

However, cannabis is currently prohibited in Finland outside of very limited medical cannabis use. A researcher affiliated with the Metropolia University of Applied Sciences recently analyzed the potential economic, societal, and fiscal impacts that cannabis legalization may have on Finland. The researcher’s findings were published on the academic database Thesus.

“This thesis will dive into the economic, societal and fiscal impact of the legalisation of Cannabis in the Nordic country of Finland.” wrote the study’s author, Jay Desilva. “By looking into other countries with similar economic, environmental, and societal aspects that have already gone through the process of legalisation, such as Canada, Thailand, and Uruguay…we can identify the trends that occurred after the legalisation process as well as the different structures implemented in order to regulate the negative effects of cannabis legalisation.”

Cannabis is currently legal at a national level for adult use in Uruguay, Canada, Malta, Luxembourg, Germany, and South Africa. Thailand has also adopted a national measure that somewhat legalized cannabis, two dozen states in the U.S. have adopted recreational cannabis measures, and regional adult-use cannabis commerce pilot trials are operating in the Netherlands and Switzerland.

The researcher in Finland analyzed “the important aspects of the economy,” such as Finland’s GDP and unemployment rate. Mr. Desilva also determined that “since Finland is a country with a cold climate for most of the year, the method of cultivation used would most likely have to be indoors,” which is not the case in some of the nations used as comparators in the analysis.

Mr. Desilva pointed out that “Uruguay has no specific excise tax on Cannabis as it’s trying to keep prices competitive with the black market” and that a corporate income tax “is applied at a rate of 25% for producers.” The researcher surmised that “a similar structure could be applied for Finland with an additional VAT applied on consumers,” which would “be viable as the cost of production is low,” and that such a tax proposal “would still keep prices competitive with the black market.”

“Economically, shifting the cannabis market from the unregulated black market to a regulated legal industry could stabilize Finland’s GDP as all the other countries who have done have seen a substantial increase in their GDP in the years following their legalisation,” the researcher found. “The taxation model suggested and used by Canada and Uruguay demonstrates how governments can effectively regulate pricing and safe cultivating methods, while keeping the legal market competitive against illicit trade.”

“Furthermore, Finland’s unique position and commitment to renewable energy could position the country as a leader in sustainable cannabis production.” Mr. Desilva added.

“The results of this research paper have found that the legalisation of Cannabis provides a substantial potential benefit for Finland as it would open up a whole new industry as well as economically the tax revenue gained from this new industry would be used to tackle the limited negative impact that legalisation would have on society as well as potential help tackle other societal challenges Finland faces such as overconsumption of alcohol.” the study’s author concluded.

At the recent International Cannabis Business Conference in Berlin, leading international cannabis economist Beau Whitney, founder of Whitney Economics, estimated that the potential global medical and adult-use cannabis market is roughly $237.8 billion, in addition to his projected value of the global industrial hemp industry of $456.2 billion.

Cannabis Use Not Independently Linked To Poorer Educational Outcomes

One of the most serious areas of cannabis public policy pertains to youth consumption. Aside from limited instances of medical use, no responsible cannabis consumer ever advocates for youngsters to be able to consume cannabis.

Unfortunately, cannabis opponents have spread so much misinformation over the years, and in some cases outright lies, that it can seem impossible at times to have a constructive conversation about youth cannabis use and its potential impact.

As with all cannabis public policies, science and facts should lead the way. A recent study in Finland examined cannabis use in adolescents and its potential impact on educational outcomes. It helps provide important context for ongoing discussions. Below is more information about it via NORML:

Helsinki, Finland: The use of alcohol, but not cannabis, in adolescence is independently associated with poorer educational attainment, according to longitudinal data published in the journal BMC Public Health.

Finnish investigators assessed the relationship between the use of cannabis and alcohol by adolescents and lifetime educational attainment in a cohort of more than 6,500 subjects.

They reported that the frequent use of alcohol during adolescence was significantly associated with poorer lifetime educational attainment after controlling for confounders. By contrast, early-onset cannabis use was not a statistically significant risk factor after researchers controlled for other variables.

The study’s authors concluded: “In this large birth cohort study with a 17-year follow-up, younger age at first intoxication, higher frequency of alcohol intoxication, and high self-reported alcohol tolerance at age 15/16 years were associated with poorer educational outcomes by the age of 33 years. These adverse associations were evident regardless of a range of potential confounders, such as behavioral/emotional problems at age 7/8 years and parental education level. The association between adolescent lifetime cannabis use and educational attainment in adulthood was no longer statistically significant after adjusting for potential confounders including alcohol use. Our finding that inherent alcohol tolerance in adolescence was associated with subsequent educational attainment has not been previously reported.”

Full text of the study, “Adolescent alcohol and cannabis use in early adulthood educational attainment in the 1986 Finland birth cohort study,” appears in BMC Public Health.

Legalization Efforts Receive A Boost In Finland

Back in October, an initiative was launched in Finland which seeks to legalize cannabis for adult use in the European country. Recently, the initiative crossed the 50,000 signatures mark and will now be considered by lawmakers. Below is an excerpt from the initiative’s text:

We propose to start drafting a law to reverse the illegality of cannabis and replace it with the following:

– The use, possession, subsistence farming, manufacture and sale of cannabis are allowed with age limits.

– Creating a regulatory system for the manufacture and sale of cannabis comparable to other substances, learning from the experience of states and states that have already legalized cannabis. The aim of the regulation is to minimise harm to individuals and society, in the same way as alcohol and tobacco legislation.

– Imposing a tax on cannabis to compensate for the harm it causes to society.

– Clearly define the distinction between intoxicating cannabis and non-intoxicating cannabis, i.e. hemp, so that hemp-growing farmers can operate in their field.

– the removal of entries on cannabis use, as well as criminal records and other similar entries resulting from minor cultivation and sales.

In line with legalization strategies ramping up in Germany and other European nations, the initiative in Finland relies on the logical argument that prohibition is more harmful to public health outcomes than regulation.

“This initiative provides a comprehensive justification for why Finland, too, should replace the Cannabis Prohibition Act with regulation. The regulation of intoxicants must be based on researched information. The Prohibition Act did not bring us a cannabis-free world. Regulation does not bring us a harm-free world of cannabis either, but it can minimise the harm and compensate for the costs.” the initiative states.

Currently, only Finland’s Green Party has publicly expressed support for cannabis legalization, with Green Party member Coel Thomas helping craft the legalization initiative that recently crossed the required signature threshold. Thomas appears to be tempering expectations regarding the initiative’s adoption in the near future while remaining hopeful for the longer term.

“It seems likely that we will have a right-wing conservative government coming in, but even under a centre-right or centre-left government, it’s not likely that we could advance legalisation. I don’t see how it could get a majority of votes,” Thomas explained according to Cannabis Health News. “However, we are starting a conversation in Finland right now, that in my opinion, will most likely lead to the legalisation and regulation of cannabis this decade.”

Recently, for the first time in Finland’s history, a majority of survey respondents (57%) indicated that they felt regular cannabis use was less harmful than binge drinking, as well as a majority of respondents (53%) indicated that they feel that personal cannabis activity should not be a crime.

CBD Furor Hits Finland

In an ongoing development in the saga for normalization and regulation of the CBD biz in the EU, the Finnish Food Authority has instructed shops to pull certain kinds of CBD products off the shelves. The products were unlicensed to be sold as foodstuffs, at least according to authorities. The reasoning used by Fimea was that those foods containing cannabinoid extracts must be classified as novel food in the EU and therefore may not be used as foodstuffs without a novel food license.

Nutritional supplements containing CBD have been sold in health food stores across the country, although in Finland, CBD oil is classified as medication. That is a very interesting distinction of course, and also guarantees that all medical CBD must also be GMP compliant.

What does this mean in the short term? Smart producers will stick with edibles that use oil rather than extracts. No matter the medical designation. This is also territory that will not change any time soon.

Novel food at heart is about the regulation of two things – the source of the plant and how it is tolerated by human beings au naturel and when processed (and how). This fight also, and just as obviously is in the room, whenever “recreational” reform involving THC also hits.

This is also one of the more nuanced announcements to be made about the topic of late. This also undoubtedly means that this language is being honed by advocates and policy geeks alike.

Whatever the future holds in other words, for the CBD part of the industry in Europe, it will be regulated, one way or another, by international, cross-region regulation that is clearly changing, albeit with the times.

What Does This Mean For Investors In Euro CBD?

Go slow and with extreme caution, but if Finland is making this kind of gesture right now, look for an evolving discussion, at a federal and international level across the region for the next 12-24 months.

For food, supplements, and medication, at least for the short term, going with an oil-based CBD ingredient is also the safest course for the short term.

Finland’s Government To Consider Decriminalizing Cannabis

Cannabis advocates in Finland have gathered enough signatures for a cannabis decriminalization petition to require a review of the proposal by Finland’s Parliament. 50,000 petition signatures were required to require the review.

As described by Marijuana Moment, the proposal ‘stipulates that possession of 25 grams or less of cannabis, and the cultivation of up to four plants, would not carry criminal penalties.’ Only one cannabis plant can be dried at any given time according to the petition.

Kasvua Kannabiksesta, the group behind the petition, stated that many of the signatures were obtained close to the deadline. Per Yle:

“People usually leave things to the last minute. We’ve been promoting this recently and getting our message out on social media. There’s certainly more than 50,000 – or even more than 100,000 – people in Finland who support this issue,” Karvinen told Yle on Wednesday evening as the initiative still only had garnered around 41,000 signatures.

Karvinen said decriminalising cannabis is warranted because prohibition of the drug hasn’t worked.

“Primarily, punishing [the use of cannabis] does more harm than good. It promotes social exclusion and [convictions for cannabis possession] can hinder a person’s access to jobs or study spots,” he explained.

Just because the petition received enough signatures to trigger a review by Finland’s Parliament, it does not mean that what is being proposed will become law in Finland. It would be logical for Finland to get on the right side of history and adopt the sensible proposal, however, only time will tell if that proves to be the case.

As of this blog post, the petition has received over 57,000 signatures. You can read the content of the petition at this link here.